Tuesday, January 27, 2004

MediaGuardian.co.uk | New media | BBC buys up 'Hutton inquiry' Google links: "48 hours before Lord Hutton delivers his verdict on the controversy surrounding the death of Dr David Kelly, the BBC has begun an advertising experiment that involves buying up all internet search terms relating to the inquiry."

InfoWorld: Microsoft launches search toolbar: January 26, 2004: By : Applications: "Microsoft launches search toolbar" Microsoft nipped at search king Google's heals Monday with the North America launch of the beta version of its new MSN Toolbar, which allows users to search the Web from a small window on the browser.

Google

Thursday, January 22, 2004

Eurekster Launches Personalized Social Search: "Google (see News.com), Yahoo (see Wall Street Journal) and AOL (see Search Engine Watch) have all made public statements that they view personalization as a vital step forward in improving search -- and as mentioned earlier, Google even owns at least two companies, Kaltix and Outride, that were involved with it.
Eurekster is first out of the block for 2004, but we'll likely see the others follow, in some way. Past issues about privacy and user resistance will remain, (see Google May Get Personal & Searching for the personal touch), but there appears the will on the part of the majors to solve these issues."

Google

Friday, January 16, 2004

Interesting new engine...About Ay-Up.com: "We are a new search engine based in Vancouver, we are working on Geo Sync Search and Search Personalization Technology. We are busy indexing the www and need your help indexing sites, please submit your site here and hopefully soon you will use Ay-Up.com search engine using zip/post code, state and keywords. You can search by keywords now. We can't guarantee when the Geo part of the service will be up it may not get finished at all because of limited funds. Please don't spam our URL's submission box our spider is working hard to index sites.
The keyword part of the search rates sites based on link relevancy & content."

Google

Inktomi is back in the Mix: "Yahoo! has owned rival search engines Inktomi, AlltheWeb and Alta Vista since last year, but had continued displaying search results from rival search site Google...

"These two moves shift the search market from a near monopoly into a high-stakes competition as Yahoo! and Google duke it out in both organic search and PPC advertising. (Yahoo! owns PPC giant Overture.)

Google

The first announcment:

ZDNet: Printer Friendly - Yahoo, Google primed for search war:

"Yahoo on Wednesday said it will drop search partner Google during the first quarter of 2004 in favor of its own technology, opening a new phase in the battle for Web search dominance.

The announcement from Yahoo CEO Terry Semel marks the first time the company has publicly disclosed a specific timeline for replacing Google, a move that has been widely expected since Yahoo announced plans to acquire search provider Inktomi for $235 million in December 2002. Inktomi has developed so-called algorithmic search technology similar to Google's that indexes Web pages and ranks them based on search terms.

Google currently processes approximately 80 percent of all search requests on the Web through distribution deals with Yahoo, Time Warner's America Online and Ask Jeeves, according to market share data compiled by research firm Comscore Media Metrix. When Yahoo ends its deal with Google, that share is expected to drop to about 54 percent. Yahoo's reach, meanwhile, could jump to 42 percent, based on its own search traffic and a deal that provides Inktomi results to Microsoft's MSN Web portal.

"This will mean virtually nothing to Google" from a business perspective, Sullivan said. "I don't know how much money they were making, but I'd be surprised if it was in the tens of millions. The real money in search is in ads, but Yahoo never carried Google's ads...What you really want to understand is the reach of their ad networks. That's not changing."

... Yahoo has expanded its deal to offer Overture's paid search results to MSN's sites throughout Europe and Asia, adding to an existing deal throughout the United States and the United Kingdom.

But the boost from the MSN deal could be short-lived, Sullivan said.
"By the end of 2004, MSN will get their act together," he said. "Then the worry for Yahoo is that MSN will prove to be a temporary boost for them."
"

Google

Thursday, January 15, 2004

Bumpy year ahead:

Features: "part one of the round-up here:
Google:
- Supplies results to its own interface and also Yahoo! and AOL (plus other less major services).
- Provides 'browsable interface' via its Google Directory (in conjunction with Open Directory).
- Owns AdWords (its answer to Overture's PPC service model).
- Free submit to crawler and directory - no paid inclusion programme (yet!)
In the very near future (Q1) Google results at Yahoo! will be replaced (most likely entirely) by Inktomi. Following the huge amount of publicity surrounding the Google IPO, shareholders may wonder why major competitor Yahoo! has a revenue stream from paid inclusion services and Google doesn't. This could possibly lead to a 'rethink' over the current policy.
Yahoo!
- Supplies Google results to its own interface.
- Provides 'browsable interface' via its own Yahoo Directory.
- Owns Overture, the innovator of the PPC model.
- Paid inclusion programmes across the board for all of its web search engines: Inktomi, AllTheWeb and AltaVista. Also has mandatory paid 'Express Inclusion' to the Yahoo web directory (for commercial sites).
As mentioned above, in the very near future, Yahoo will make the 'big switch' to Inktomi results. This means search marketers can kiss goodbye to huge amounts of free traffic and say hello to paid inclusion Inktomi traffic (if they want 'guaranteed' inclusion to the index).
Yahoo has already been carrying out experiments and tests with both Inktomi and Overture with its web properties outside of the US in advance of the big switch. Terry Semel, CEO Yahoo has gone on record to say: 'Our short-term goal will be to have Yahoo throughout the entire world using our algorithmic search in Inktomi.'
What happens to AltaVist"

Google

Search Engine Wars - Innovate To Survive in 2004: "Search Engine Wars - Innovate To Survive in 2004"
The message is clear: you can't rely on just one search engine for all of your traffic. You must use all your wits to emerge victorious from the search engine wars. Google is important, but it is not everything. Keep your eyes and ears open to new opportunities and old standbys: other search engines and directories, paid placement and pay-per-click, newsletters, and even more traditional channels.

Who Will Stay Tops In The Search Engines?
You never know who will become the leader in search engines. It was only a few years ago that directories were the major force--until the upstart search engine Google came along. Google got its start about five years ago and hasn't looked back. As long as Google provides good results for its users, it is in a good position to stay on top. However, with MSN working on the creation of its own search engine and Yahoo's acquisition of Overture (which includes AlltheWeb and AltaVista), things could get interesting in 2004. Microsoft is always a force to be reckoned with, and Yahoo certainly has the tools to become a major competitor to Google.

Inktomi's New Role
Inktomi may play an important role in this growth since it is now owned by Yahoo. Keep an eye on this engine: it provides secondary results for MSN and will probably replace Google in supplying primary results in Yahoo. Inktomi's importance may also increase in MSN once the Microsoft property stops using LookSmart for its primary results.

To see which pages you have listed in Inktomi, use the Inktomi Pure Search function from Positiontech:

http://search.positiontech.com/InktomiSearch/PositionTechSearch.jsp

Inktomi often adds a few free pages to its databases. Check first to see which pages you may already have in their database for free before using Paid Inclusion for your most important pages.

Google

Wednesday, January 14, 2004

Why Ecommerce is Not Ready for My Daughter or Me: "Why Ecommerce is Not Ready for My Daughter or Me
By Kim Krause 2004-01-13 "
We assume that the top 20 sites in search engine results are the best of the best based on our search keywords. That, I'm afraid, is the saddest shock of all. Top rank doesn't equal the best online experience once you click into that website. That part of usability wasn't tested for you by the search engine or directory. That's not their job.

Google

Excellent debate covering a number of POVs....if needed
Cre8asite forums. Search Engine Optimization (SEO) - Is it time to get out of the SEO business?. [ Search Engine Optimization, Usability and Web Design. ]: "
The basics are still valid... "

"Joining the SEO game is a little bit like moving to LA. No matter that you've heard all the stories about quakes, you still are never prepared for the first one that comes along in your own experience. You can tell how long someone has lived there by the severity of the quake that they take in their stride."

Google

Tuesday, January 13, 2004

Searching for Dominance: What Will Microsoft Search Look Like?: "SIS, or Stuff I've Seen. Although it's focus is to help users find files and information on their desktop, its implications for web search functionality could be dramatic. It pulls information from multiple file formats, including emails and webpages, and records them in a single index. This allows the user to search through them using a powerful interface that allows for the application of several filters at the same time. The search process becames a real time iterative process, allowing the user to quickly narrow down the search to the most relevant findings.

Implicit Query

'Stuff I've Seen' gives the user a powerful tool to find files and information on their desktop. Implicit Query (the link goes to an interesting Powerpoint presentation prepared by the Microsoft Research team) goes one step further by continually searching and retrieving information based on what the user is doing. As the program tracks user behaviour, it refines its model of what is important and relevant to the user and filters the search results accordingly. This is an extension of Microsoft''s Lumiere research which has modeled the Bayesian logic behind the current automated assistance functionality.

Memory Landmarks

A third Microsoft project doesn't hold nearly the same promise for web search, but it would make an interesting add on feature. Memory Landmarks can add historical remarks to a list of chronological search results."

Recommended Australia Search Engine for PPC Ad - Best Practices Search Engine Forums
Recommended Australia Search Engine for PPC Ad - Best Practices Search Engine Forums: "Recommended Australia Search Engine for PPC Ad "

stick with Google AdWords and target your ads to Google Australia users. As far as I know, Google is the most popular search engine in Australia and far outperforms any of the others. I think you can create a direct account with Google Australia if you want certain sponsorship category exposure, or you can set up your Google AdWords account with Google.com to only be shown to searchers from Australia (whether they use Google.com or Google.com.au).

For a while there, you could get good results from a PPC LookSmart Australia listing because of the results being shown on NineMSN, but now that LookSmart is ending their relationship with MSN this month, I'm not sure how long the NineMSN relationship will continue for or whether it would be worthwhile. I haven't used Overture in a while so I don't know if this is possible, but if they allow regional targeting, you could set up a PPC campaign with them to target Australian searchers using their partner sites (e.g. Yahoo.com.au etc).

I am not aware of any other high performing PPC players in Australia at this stage. Sounds like a business opportunity!

... summary is spot on. The only thing worth adding is that the Australian Market will get interesting in about 2 weeks time, when Overture Australia has its official launch (on 19 Jan I think).....

Google

The glass ceiling :: Search Engine Optimization at ChriSEO.com :: Search Engine optimization and web site ranking tips, articles and news

It is o­nly by using the traditional concept getting off-the-page factors and/or the linkable content method that allows an optimizer to break through the glass ceiling and actually be competitive.

Google

Monday, January 12, 2004

IBM WebFountain & Factiva For example, imagine a marketing researcher trying to find out the online attitude of consumers toward the popular rock singer Pink. The researcher would have to wade through an ocean of search results to sort out which Web pages were talking about Pink, the person, rather than pink, the color.

What such a researcher needs is not another search engine, but something beyond that—an analysis engine that can sniff out its own clues about a document’s meaning and then provide insight into what the search results mean in aggregate. And that’s just what IBM is about to deliver...

Once documents have been annotated in the main cluster, another series of specialized machines go to work, using clues such as how Web pages link to one another (similar to the technique Google uses to determine relevance rankings for its search results) to gain additional insight into the significance of a document. The documents are then handed off to another cluster that performs high-level analyses. Because the data has been converted from an unstructured format to a structured XML-based format, IBM and its partners can fall back on the data-mining experience and methodologies already developed for analyzing databases. The structured format also provides an easy target for developing new analytic tools.

By creating an open commercial platform for content providers and data miners, it will foster rapid innovation and commercialization in the realm of machine understanding, currently dominated by isolated research projects. This would herald a sea change in our ability to use computers to generate insight and understanding that directly affect the bottom lines of businesses, something that is unfortunately all too rare with current IT systems.

Google

More local search (see also Google blog same date re Google labs local search) The city guide to entertainment, restaurants, events, hotels, movies and businesses: "City, State OR Zip Code "
in many ways, Citysearch is already the model of search and directory convergence. While not perfect, Citysearch presents a hybrid approach that combines pay-per-click advertising for local businesses, with a keyword search-driven interface over a structured local database. That provides the ease of use of search with the reliable structured data offered by Yellow Pages.

This is not to say that all "local search" will ape Citysearch, but conceptually this is where the market is heading. By the end of 2004 or early 2005 all Internet Yellow Pages will look and operate lot more like "local search engines" than they do now. Similarly, there will be a lot more Yellow Pages-like structured data behind search engines' localization efforts going forward. This is what I mean by "the hybrid future."

Google

Content content content...
Web content management predictions for 2004: January 12, 2003 issue of New Thinking by Gerry McGovern: "This is the year when web content comes of age. "

Google

Friday, January 09, 2004

www.clickz.com: "How to allocate your budget for maximum ROI. "

Google

News - Hoover's Online:

"First, Yahoo is expected to dump Google as the primary search technology on its site within a few months, a move that could come around the time Google is preparing a long-awaited initial stock offering."

Second, Yahoo wants to combine personalization and customization features to extend the usefulness of searches.

Third, it plans to expand its use of "paid inclusion,"

Google

Thursday, January 08, 2004

Not exactly SEO - except as giving searchers what they want...Top Ten Web Design Mistakes of 2003 (Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox): "Top Ten Web Design Mistakes of 2003"

6. No "What-If" Support


Comparing and choosing between alternatives is the basis for most critical Web tasks, yet most websites don't support users who want to consider alternatives.
What if I want to travel out Sunday instead of Saturday? How would that affect the price of my airline ticket? On most travel sites, the only way to answer this question is to start again from the first screen and plan an entirely new trip, losing all the work required to build your first itinerary.

What if I want a color copier instead of a monochrome one, but I'm satisfied with all the other attributes of the monochrome copier I'm currently viewing? Can I navigate by attribute and change only one parameter? Usually not.

Some websites do let users pick out a few products and view a comparison table, but such tables typically have low usability and don't highlight the most important differences between products.

7) Useful winnowing (of lists ) requires four things.

The site must support winnowing in the first place, and most don't.
The winnowing attributes must make sense to users rather than being highly technical or company-internal (say, using part numbers, even though they may be offered for search if customers know exactly what they want).
Criteria should differentiate products of interest from those the user wants to ignore. Examples:
Show only products that can be delivered by Christmas Eve.
Show only shoes that are available in size 10 extra-wide.
Finally, of course, the user interface that controls the winnowing process must be simple so that users can focus their attention on attributes and listings, not on the mechanics of operating the site.

Google

Wednesday, January 07, 2004

Super Searchers on Madison Avenue: "tips from these super searchers:
Search proactively so that you'll have the answers, or at least the best resources, at the ready. This is particularly helpful if you're in a high-pressure situation where you need to find information on deadline.
If you're looking for consumer information, online 'complaint' forums such as Planet Feedback, Complaints.com, and even Google Groups are a gold mine.
Use specialized directories to search for experts, then contact them directly by email or phone.
If you're looking for information on obsolete or discontinued products, your first stop should be eBay.
A great resource to see what's hot and what's not in advertising is Ad Critic. " AdCritic.com: Commercial Ads

The SuperSearchers Web Page: "This page features a growing collection of links to subject-specific Web resources recommended by the world�s leading online searchers.

Currently, links to global business, primary research, mergers & acquisitions, news, writing, health & medicine, investment, business, entrepreneurial research, legal, advertising/market research, and competitive intelligence information resources are featured here. "

Google

Tuesday, January 06, 2004

Slashdot | Better Search Results Than Google?: "Better Search Results Than Google?"

Mechanik writes "CNN has an AP article about the next generation of up and coming search tools, which try to cope with the glut of hits that result from 'conventional' search engines such as Google. One tool, Vivisimo, "is like a superfast librarian who can instantly arrange the titles on shelves in a way that makes sense. [...] But unlike libraries, Vivisimo doesn't use predefined categories. Its software determines them on the fly, depending on the search results. The filing is done through a combination of linguistic and statistical analysis." Grokker, another, downloadable program, "not only sorts search results into categories but also "maps" the results in a holistic way, showing each category as a colorful circle. Within each circle, subcategories appear as more circles that can be clicked on and zoomed in on." You have to love the author's use of trying to look for a hotel in France with the terms 'Paris Hilton' as an example of searching gone awry." ...

"This Vivisimo is a step in the right direction, but there's a lot of way to go through.

For example try to make this search using any engine (Vivisimo, Google, Yahoo, Altavista, etc): who was the red-haired singer that recorded a song with Tom Morello a few years back?. At least I can't find an answer because one of the main aspects I'm using (the red hair) maybe is not as important as other aspects used to describe the situation by anyone else.

There must be a interface revolution in the years to come. Come to think of it, are we still using a textfield to express every possible combination in a google search? Gross!!!"

Google

Monday, January 05, 2004

Invaluable index to Free Pint topics

FreePint Index :: November 1997 - December 2003: "FreePint Index which was published on the 31st December 2003."

Google

MarketingWonk - Internet Marketing and Advertising News

In full from I-Copywriting Digest 10 November 2003 cos their archives stink..

TOPIC: Copywriting and SEO

FROM: Detlev Johnson - detlev,searchenginewriting.com

Hello Nick,

I was excited to read your take on SEO and writing.
It's as if search engines seem to lead writers
astray from basic writing principles and the art form
itself.

I can say that SEO writing is a subset of online
writing, not so much a subset of SEO. The thing that
complicates matters is that SEO writing is a product
of SEO. Whereas I think of SEO as a good online
writer's skill of adaptation to the world of Web
search engines. That means I would look for a bona
fide writer to take such an important role in my SEO
company.

Your concerns about SEO writing being done by
lackluster writers that purport to be professional
writers is true and gives our industry an ugly face.
Most of the SEO writing I've come across is
miserable. We absolutely need more bona fide writers
to work in our field (providing they have
interest.)

I encourage some here to consider freelancing at
least some SEO work to develop a good feel for a
style that works in search engines. I have the
pleasure to know good writers who are worth their
weight in gold, because there are not a lot of them.
There are even fewer writers skilled in SEO writing.

*cheers*

-detlev

Detlev Johnson


Comment?
mailto:copywriting@marketingwonk.com?subject=Copywriting_and_SEO

............................................................



TOPIC: Copywriting and SEO

FROM: Andy Gartner - andy,onalaskaweb.com

Hello all,

This is actually in response to two topics which in
my opinion are very much the same, they are
Copywriting and SEO and Should writers learn HTML.

First let me disclose that I am not a writer, I own a
small web design business and employ 4 people.
Currently 2 designers, 1 programmer and 1 marketing
director. I belong to a local group that is called
Designers Do Lunch, it is a very informal group of
creatives - graphic designers, writers, proofreaders,
publishers, printers, etc. This topic was actually
discussed at one meeting. If a writer is going to
write copy for web sites, do they need to learn HTML.
My opinion and the opinion of most of the designers
in the discussion was absolutely NO. If writers are
going to write copy for web sites they need to learn
SEO. You see the problem with Mike's comments
about a non-writer being able to optimize a site for
high rankings is only one sided. It doesn't do
any good to write just for search engines, that is
only half the audience. He is missing the other half
of the audience and that would be people. This is
were a skilled writer comes in. It doesn't work
to have high traffic to a site but have lower sales
because the copy is bad. Don't bother learning
HTML, leave that up to the developer or designer
instead learn SEO. This way you can create a balance
between writing for search engines and people.

Copywriting for web sites and SEO are and should be
one and the same thing. I was recently interviewed by
a student at the local community college enrolled in
their Technical Writing program because she wants to
write for web sites. During the interview I asked
her what they were teaching about search engines, she
said that someone had brought them up in class but
the professor said that they won't cover that
and he also said that search engines don't
matter. Is everyone missing the boat on this one?

The copy on your site is to serve two purposes,
attract the bots of search engines and sell your
product or services to your site's visitors.
Should this task not be performed by the same person?
It seems to me that people really miss the whole
picture of a site if they are only working towards
one or the other. People, you can have both - create
a balance in your copy.

Within the next few months I plan to hire a
writer/SEO person in my company. This person will
handle all SEO and copywriting for my company. I
plan to hire a someone who is primarily a writer and
teach SEO to him/her. In the past, when I need a
writer, I hire a writer and then once she has a rough
put together. She and I site down and go through it
together. I try to change for SEO and she tells me
what she will let me change and what I can't.
Together we create a balanced product and a much
better one in my opinion. There is give and take on
both ends. Yes, I don't get it optimized as
much as I would like, but she doesn't get the
perfectly flowing copy she wants either. I could
probably get it to rank a little higher but then how
would the sales be for this site.

Thanks,

Andy Gartner


Andy Gartner
Onalaska Web
Affordable Web Design and Hosting
http://www.onalaskaweb.com


Comment?
mailto:copywriting@marketingwonk.com?subject=Copywriting_and_SEO

............................................................



TOPIC: Copywriting and SEO

FROM: Jill Whalen - jill,highrankings.com

Hi Nick and all...

I usually agree with Mike Banks Valentine, and in
fact he has written a few guest articles for my
newsletter. However, I have to strongly disagree
with some of the points he made in the last issue of
I-Copywriting.

Mike said:

>> SEO's take existing web copy and
massage it to make the text and page structure
crawler friendly so that those search engine spiders
will recognize what a given page is about. The goal
is to gain top rankings in the search engines for
competitive keyword phrases targeted by our clients.

Those clients could often benefit from a seasoned
professional writer RE-writing their web pages as
well, but only if they were willing to FOREGO high
search engine rankings. <<

Sorry, Mike, but you've got to be kidding?
There's an entire new field created just for
this purpose called SEO Copywriting (which I like to
flatter myself into thinking I had a little hand in
creating!). The whole idea is to write for the
search engines AND the site visitors. There's
absolutely no reason to forego high rankings in
exchange for professional copywriting. The thought of
that is simply ludicrous to me.

Yes, it's true that the typical SEOs job is to
edit existing copy so that it utilizes the keyword
phrases. In fact, that's my specialty, and
it's what my Nitty-gritty report is based on.
BUT...and this is a huge but...it's not always
possible to edit existing copy in a way that will
make sense for the search engines and the site's
users.

In those cases, it's imperative that the SEO put
away their ego to step down and let the professional
copywriters take over. I firmly believe that any
good professional copywriter worth their salt can
easily be trained in SEO copywriting. In fact, it
takes them generally about 2 or 3 pages to understand
what they need to do, if they have the benefit of a
decent SEO teaching them.

SEOs should stay away from trying to write copy, just
as copywriters should stay away from thinking they
are SEOs just because they know how to write for the
search engines. Both need to work together, not
separately.

IMO, any SEO who does not have a professional
copywriter on staff or contracted out, is doing a
huge disservice to their clients because there's
no sense in getting high rankings if your site's
copy sounds like it was written by an SEO. It will
be a million times harder to make a sale in under
those circumstances. Let's face it, the best
SEOs are somewhat technically inclined, and the best
copywriters are generally creatively inclined.
Together, they make a killer optimization team.

For all you professional copywriters on this list,
the world of SEO copywriting is wide open right now.
There are only a few really good people in the field,
although it's growing by leaps and bounds. SEO
is hot; very hot. If you're having trouble
finding good writing jobs, I would strongly suggest
that you learn the art of SEO copywriting and then
find some SEOs to partner with. You will benefit,
the SEO will benefit and most of all, the clients
looking for high rankings, sales and a site that
totally rocks, will benefit from it!

Best,

Jill Whalen

TOPIC: Copywriting and SEO

FROM: Karon Thackston - karon,copywritingcourse.com

Dear Nick,

In response to Mike Banks Valentine's comments
regarding SEO copywriting. Mike said:

>> I guarantee that you, as a professional
writer, would not want to see a keyword phrase
repeated six or seven times on a page of 600 words.
I'll wager that you would even recommend
reducing that page to 250 words or less to gain
clarity and focus, that you'd vary your words to
avoid repetition, that you'd re-write headlines
to emphasize the sizzle rather than the steak, that
you would opt for simple metaphor rather than
industry buzzword.

BUT every one of those moves would destroy search
engine position for that client. He now has a
beautifully written page that nobody will ever find
by doing a search at Google. Congratulations on your
stellar written work - which is now invisible to the
search engines! <<

Mike is wrong. This is exactly what I do. As a
professional SEO copywriter, I DO want to see the
keyword phrases repeated. I do want longer copy on
the page to increase saturation. I don't
recommend reducing the copy to 250 words.

A professional SEO copywriter is trained to create
copy that is the happy solution that Mike says he
can't find. We have a talent to be able to
create the sizzle without burning the steak. Our
profession dictates that we create copy that
impresses both the visitor and the search engines.

So Mike, while I understand your comments *if*
written to copywriters, I just wanted you to take
heart! There are SEO copywriters who provide the
very things you believe are missing.

Karon Thackston
www.marketingwords.com

Google

2003: A Year in Interviews: "This highlight reel reflects a number of the issues that had a major impact on the Internet, technology and general business best practices. Many focus on search, often in cases where that wasn't the intended topic of discussion. E-mail marketing and overcoming spam come up several times. Making the most of metrics and finding ways to better understand customers are prevalent issues regardless of the company or medium"

Google

Search results -- I-SEARCH: "I-SEARCH" I-Search Digest
Understanding Internet Search Technology
2003-12-30| Issue #576

An obvious and relatively easy way to help clients determine the value of a past SEO campaign is to multiply the number of organic SE referrals by the average bid amount for relevant phrases in Overture and AdWords..

A more sophisticated ROI analysis entails helping clients fill out the following formula before doing a PPC campaign (this is an actual formula I used for a client): $400 (acceptable cost of sale) x 1.8% (conversion of prospects who became customers) x 4.6% (3158 April visits divided into 146 online info requests) = $0.33 maximum bid.

VS I don't think you can put an intrinsic value on any position any more than you can guarantee a certain position. With the search engines holding all the cards you can't do either (unless you guarantee a top ranking for a worthless word set).

When you pay for SEO it should be for the commitment, effort, and knowledge. If you know that they know their stuff and they want you to succeed then you probably will. While some rates may seem sky high, SEO is probably not a good area to cut corners in if you are interested in the long term success of your business.

Google

One Firm's Story: What Can Happen When You Spam

Google
Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.